论文部分内容阅读
梁启超说:“古代无所谓史学,真正的史学,应谈从司马迁作《史记》以后说起”。这话有一定道理,真正的历史著作,也应当从司马迁的《史记》算起。同书籍起源于档案一样,历史著作也起源于档案。我国古代,“史”是官名而不是书名。大约到周末,才有“史记”的名称,指的是史官的记载,但运用也不广泛。古人说的“书”或“史记”,实际上都是一些原始记录或文件汇编。孔子从卜官那里的材料中编纂成《易》,从史官那里的材料中编纂成《(春秋》,这当然更接近我们今天所说的档案汇编。
Liang Qichao said: “Ancient does not matter historiography, real history, should talk about Sima Qian as” Historical Records “after talking about.” There is some truth to these words. The true historical works should also be counted from Sima Qian's “Historical Records.” Like the books that originated in archives, historical writings also originated in archives. In ancient China, “history” is the official name rather than the title. About the weekend, there is “Shi Ji” name refers to the records of the historian, but the use is not widespread. The ancients said that “books” or “historical records” are actually some original records or compilations of documents. Compiled into “Yi” from the material of the Magistrate, Confucius was compiled from the materials of the historian into "(Spring and Autumn), which of course is closer to the compilation of the archives we are talking about today.