论文部分内容阅读
最近,本刊不断收到读者来信,反映各地在制定各科教师的工作量时,一般都将生物课教师每周工作量定为16至18节,而语文、政治、数、理、化课则为121—16节. 大家认为对生物课工作量的这种偏高的规定,反映了一些领导对生物课不了解,不重视的情况.而这种情况在全国带有普遍性,这不利于生物课教学改革和教学质量的提高,严重的影响了生物教师的积极性. 来信提出工作量的制定应该考虑以下几方面的情况:1.有利于为“四化”作出贡献,多出人才,快出人才,出好人才,多出科研成果,全面
Recently, we have received a series of letters from readers, reflecting that the local workload of teachers in biology usually ranges from 16 to 18 during the formulation of the workload of teachers in various fields. However, Chinese, politics, mathematics, science and chemistry Then 121-16.We think that such a high requirement for the workload of biology class reflects the situation that some leaders do not understand or pay attention to the biology class and this situation is universal in the whole country, Which is beneficial to the teaching reform and teaching quality improvement of biology class, which has seriously affected the enthusiasm of biology teacher.The letter proposed that the workload should be formulated in the following aspects: 1. To contribute to the “four modernizations” Out of talent, a good talent, more scientific research, comprehensive