论文部分内容阅读
《四库全书总目》在著录杨升庵的《谢华启秀》时,对其编纂意图、注释体例、收罗范围、对偶工拙等多有指责。本文认为这些指责与原书状况出入较大,甚欠公允:作者编篡该书的意图旨在倡导博学以矫时弊;其注文体例难脱离当时的时代背景,应予理解;关于收罗范围,并非都不当,应区别考量;至于对偶工拙问题,杨升庵只是辑录前人佳句丽事以资启迪,不愿以格式伤内容,应予谅解。除此之外,还应看到,该书多辑名作要籍,平正通达,足以博大眼界,启迪文思,自其问世以来,后出之类书、杂纂及近代辞书多所取用,其作用和影响不可低估。
The Sikuquanshu Zongmu, when writing “Xie Hua Qixiu” of Yangsheng’an, accused him of compiling his or her intent, annotating his style, collecting range, or even his own. This paper argues that these accusations and the original book situation have a large discrepancy and are not fair: the author’s intention of compiling the book is to advocate erudition to rectify the disadvantages; the note style is difficult to separate from the background of the time and should be understood; Are not appropriate, should be different considerations; As for the couple labor problems, Yang Sheng-an just record the predecessor Jialiangli thing to enlighten, do not want to hurt the format content should be forgiven. In addition, we should also see that this book is famous for its masterpieces, fair and accessible, enough to broaden horizons, inspire Vance, since its inception, after the class of books, miscellaneous codification and the use of modern dictionaries, its role And the impact can not be underestimated.