人们还记得:1988年9期《中国戏剧》,以头版头条的醒目位置,刊载晓赓的《涂玲慧该不该评二级》一文,为赣剧青年演员涂玲慧荣膺梅花奖后遭到不公正待遇,仗义执言。紧接下一期刊物,又发表张庚等著名戏剧家的谈话,旗帜鲜明地表示声援。这几乎成了震动全国戏曲界的一个“事件”。许多人激起了强烈共鸣,期待着“赣水那边”的反响。可这反响却迟迟不来。为什么?还不是“公说公有理,婆说婆有理”的传统偏见和流言蜚语,把一清二楚的事情搅得个纷纷乱乱,难解难分。要办成一件好事,难哪! 玲慧毕竟年轻,涉世未深,待人接物有这样那样 People still remember: In 1988, nine Chinese dramas were highlighted by headlines. They published the article “Tu Linghui Should Not Evaluate Grade Two” by Xiaotao, and unfairly treated Tu Linghui, a young actor from the Jiangxi Opera, , Justification. Followed by the next issue of the publication, also published Zhang Geng and other famous dramatist conversation, clearly expressed their solidarity. It almost became an “incident” that shocked the national opera circles. Many people aroused strong resonance and looked forward to the “Gan River Water” response. But this response has not come yet. Why? Not a traditional prejudice and gossip about “public philosophical publicity and woman-to-woman philosophical reasoning”, which confuses clear-cut things with chaos and indifference. To do a good deed, which is difficult! Ling Hui, after all, young, inexperienced, treats people have such things