论文部分内容阅读
最高人民法院就知识产权的司法保护,出台了一系列司法解释,在立法理念、立法技巧、立法的可操作性上,特别是在解决商标纠纷问题上,都反映出了与时俱进和科学发展观的理念。但是在实践中,我们也感觉仍有一些需要完善的地方。一、司法解释存在的问题1、《最高人民法院关于审理涉及知识产权权利冲突民事纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解释》(以下简称为“关于知识产权纠纷的解释”)中,第3条“对涉及注册商
The Supreme People’s Court has promulgated a series of judicial interpretations on the judicial protection of intellectual property. It reflects the advancing with the times and the science on the operability of legislation, legislative skills and legislation, and especially on the resolution of trademark disputes The concept of development concept. But in practice, we also feel there is still some room for improvement. I. Problems Existing in Judicial Interpretation 1. In the Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Cases of Civil Disputes involving Conflicts of Intellectual Property Rights (hereinafter referred to as ”the interpretation of disputes concerning intellectual property rights“), Article 3 ”For registrars involved