一、引言我于1985年在日本刑法学大会的共同研讨中做了关于兴奋剂案件和故意论的关系的报告~(〔1〕),此后的1991年和1992年,我又组织了两次相同主题的专题讨论会。~(〔2〕)我想在之前的这些研究的基础上,就近来的关于故意论的学说~(〔3〕),从成立故意所必要的实质内容(事实的错误和法律的错误的区别)的角度出发进行一些整理。至今为止的专题讨论会中,在研究了故意的实质化倾向的存在以及其具体内容的同时,可以说 I. INTRODUCTION I made a report on the relationship between stimulant cases and intentional theory in a joint seminar of Japan’s Criminal Law Seminar in 1985 ([1]). From 1991 to 1992, I organized two more Symposia on the same topic. On the basis of these previous studies, I would like to comment on the recent theory of intentional theory (3), from the point of view of establishing the essential substance necessary for the intentional (the difference between the factual mistake and the law error) ) Point of departure for some finishing. At the symposium so far, we can say that while studying the existence and specific content of intentional substantive tendencies