论文部分内容阅读
关于项羽失败原因的历史分析很多,无非是从政治手段、军事才能或人物性格方面去寻找项羽与刘邦的差距。我不是学历史出身的,但对历史有很大的兴趣和大致了解。我就奇怪了,为什么有一个非常显明的原因在分析项羽的失败中没有被提及,至少在我的阅读范围内我没有触及到。这至少说明,这个原因或许有前人注意到了,但却没有被广泛接受与传播。确实,楚汉之争,或者说项羽与刘邦之争,开初时,双方的实力相差悬殊,项羽占尽
The historical analysis of the causes of Xiang Yu’s failure is nothing more than looking for the gap between Xiang Yu and Liu Bang in terms of political means, military capabilities or character. I did not study history, but I had a great deal of interest and general understanding of history. I was weird, why there is a very obvious reason not to mention the failure of the analysis of Xiang Yu, at least in the scope of my reading I did not touch. This at least shows that this may have been noticed by the predecessors, but not widely accepted and disseminated. Indeed, the controversy between Chu and Han, or Xiang Yu and Liu Bang controversy, the beginning of the two sides, the strength of the difference between the disproportionate Xiang Yu