我国刑事诉讼证明标准理论上存在客观真实与法律真实之争 ,二者都是在认识论角度论证 ,因此应引入价值论分析方法。国外存在客观的“排除合理怀疑”和主观的“内心确信”的证明标准 ,二者相互依存 ,相互渗透。在具体界定我国“证据确实充分”的证明标准时 ,应当根据所要证明的罪行轻重 ,适用不同的证明标准 There is a dispute between objective truth and legal truth in the theoretical proof of criminal procedure in our country. Both of them are argumentation from the perspective of epistemology. Therefore, the value theory analysis method should be introduced. Foreign countries have objective proof standards of “excluding reasonable suspicion” and subjective “inner conviction”, and the two are interdependent and interpenetrating. In the specific definition of China’s “evidence is indeed sufficient” standard of proof, it should be based on the severity of the crimes to be proved, the application of different standards of proof