论文部分内容阅读
最近,翻翻自然科学史,读到一些耐人寻味的故事: 我国明代杰出的医药学家李时珍,在编写《本草纲目》过程中,数次远出考察,进入深山采药,拜访当地的樵夫、药农和猎户,不仅积累了丰富的药草资料,而且纠正了前人的许多谬误,弄清了许多疑难问题。比如一本旧《本草》把漏篮子与虎掌当成同一种药,李时珍经过实践发现,它们是两种不同的药,虎掌是有毒的,漏篮子是无毒的,如果把虎掌当作漏篮子配给病人吃,只会加重病人的病情,造成医疗事故。又如,唐代的《本草经集注》说远志的叶小,而宋代的《开宝本草》却说远志叶大,究竟哪种说法对呢?李时珍向自然界调查研究,发现
Recently, I read through the history of natural sciences and read some intriguing stories: Li Shizhen, an outstanding Chinese medical scientist in the Ming Dynasty, came out several times in the process of composing the “Compendium of Materia Medica”, entered the mountains and took medicine, visited the local woodcutter, Farmers and hunters not only accumulated rich herbal medicine information, but also corrected many of their predecessors’ fallacies and clarified many difficult problems. For example, an old “Materia Medica” to drain the basket with the tiger’s palm as the same medicine, Li Shizhen through practice found that they are two different drugs, tiger’s palm is toxic, drain the basket is non-toxic, if the tiger’s palm as Losing basket to the patient to eat, will only aggravate the patient’s condition, resulting in medical accidents. Another example, the Tang Dynasty, “Materia Medica Note” that Polygalaceae Ye Xiao, while the Song Dynasty, “Kai Bao Materia Medica” but said Polygalaceae, what kind of argument? Li Shizhen to the natural investigation and study found that