论文部分内容阅读
分析语音史“一线制”架构形成原因,探讨并反思自有清以来数百年的“一线制”语音史存在的内部矛盾,分析清儒“古音说”、“古合韵说”和“通转说”各自的特点及存在的困难,通过现代语言学家对历史方音全方位考察的有效推进与古今类比的成功,确认语音史中历史方音研究的重要性和必要性,设想新的语音史框架需要包含两个层次:上位层是通语音系,下位层是历史方音。
Analyze the reasons for the formation of phonetic history “one-line system ”, explore and reflect on the internal contradictions existing in “one-line system ” phonetic history for hundreds of years since Qing dynasty, The characteristics of modern Chinese phoneticists and the successful promotion of the comprehensive study of historical dialects and the success of ancient and modern analogies, confirming the historical study of historical vowels in the history of phonology The importance and necessity of the new phonetic history framework, imagine the need to include two levels: the upper strata is the phonetic system, the lower strata is the history of square tone.