论文部分内容阅读
11月7日和9日,本刊编辑部在唐山、保定两市教育局教研室的协助下,分别在唐山、保定两市邀请部分中小学历史教师举行了李秀成评价问题座谈会。两地教师在发言中一致谈到,通过最近学术界对李秀成的讨论,认识到李秀成是太平天国革命的叛徒,他向敌人写的“自白书”就是叛变革命的铁证。对叛徒必须否定,一切替叛徒论功过、争地位的做法,都是立场不稳、敌我不分的表现。用这种观点讲述历史,必然是抹煞了阶级斗争,使学生在思想上混淆了敌我,实际上就是帮了阶级敌人的忙。所以李秀成问题的讨论,不是个单纯学术问
On November 7 and 9, the editorial department of this magazine, with the help of the teaching and research offices of the Education Bureau of Tangshan and Baoding, invited some teachers of history in primary and secondary schools in Tangshan and Baoding to hold a symposium on evaluation issues of Li Xiucheng. In their speeches, the two teachers unanimously stated that through the recent academic discussions on Li Xiucheng, he realized that Li Xiucheng was a traitor to the Taiping Revolution and that the “confession book” he wrote to the enemy was a testimony to betrayal of the revolution. We must reject the traitors, and all the practices of fighting for the traitors and fighting for their place are the manifestations of instability and the distinction between the enemy and ourselves. To tell history from this point of view must inevitably discredit the class struggle and confound the students ideologically with the enemy and ourselves. In fact, they are helping the class enemies. Therefore, the discussion of Li Xiucheng’s question is not a pure academic question