论文部分内容阅读
在《地狱篇》第15歌中,但丁在犯鸡奸罪的恶灵中遇到了先前的老师布鲁内托·拉蒂尼,由于没有历史证据可以证明拉蒂尼犯过鸡奸罪,他在此处的出现就显得怪诞。一些学者认为拉蒂尼就是犯鸡奸罪者,但他们忽略了《神曲》是具有多重寓意的诗歌;另一些学者注意到了《神曲》的寓意,认为拉蒂尼的罪过在于其思想而非性行为:理查·凯认为,拉蒂尼之罪在于政治上的分裂倾向,而阿莫尔则认为,拉蒂尼的错误在于其宿命论思想。以上两种意见多少都忽略了文本语境,本文力图通过对《地狱篇》一些片段的细读指出,在寓意层面上,拉蒂尼之罪实为古典学者渎神的傲慢。
In the 15th song of Hell, Dante met Brunello Lattini, a former teacher, in the evil spirits of sodomy. In the absence of historical evidence to prove that Lattini had committed sodomy, Here’s the emergence of grotesque. Some scholars think that Latini is a sin-singer, but they ignore the “Divine Comedy” is a multi-meaning poem; others have noticed the “Divine Comedy” moral, that Latini’s sin lies in his thinking rather than sex : Richard Kay believes that Lattini’s sin is the tendency of political divisions, and Amor believes that Latini’s mistake lies in his fatalism. The above two views are mostly ignored the context of the text, the paper tries to point out some fragments of “Hell” pointed out that at the moral level, Latti’s sin is the arrogant blasphemy of classical scholars.