论文部分内容阅读
[目的]通过对2015版危险化学品目录与相关储存标准的适用性研究,提出存在的问题和相应建议,为以后国家制订相关政策提供参考。[方法]运用文献法与比较法,将《危险化学品目录》(2015版)中危险化学品的分类原则与危险化学品储存的三类标准进行比较,并结合国外相关规范,提出针对性建议。[结果]目前的三类危险化学品的储存标准并没有涵盖《危险化学品目录》(2015版)中全部81个危险性分类,且两者的分类依据也不完全相同。[结论]建议对现行危险化学品储存标准进行修订,统一危险化学品分类依据,对危险性不同的化学品进行差异化管理;对特殊危险性物质的储存规范进行细化,尽可能减少危险化学品储存事故的发生。
[Objective] Based on the study on the applicability of the 2015 version of the catalog of hazardous chemicals and related storage standards, the existing problems and corresponding suggestions were put forward to provide references for the formulation of relevant policies in future countries. [Method] By comparing the classification principles of hazardous chemicals in dangerous chemicals catalog (version 2015) with the three kinds of standards for storage of hazardous chemicals by using the methods of literature and comparative methods and putting forward the pertinent suggestions . [Results] The storage criteria of the current three types of hazardous chemicals do not cover all 81 hazard categories in the Dangerous Chemical Substances Catalog (2015 version), and the classification criteria are not the same. [Conclusion] It is suggested that the existing storage standards of hazardous chemicals should be revised to unify the classification basis of hazardous chemicals and differentially manage the chemicals with different risks. The storage specification of special hazardous substances should be refined to minimize the risks of hazardous chemicals The occurrence of product storage accidents.