论文部分内容阅读
[目的]通过《危险化学品目录(2015版)》与联合国通用化学品分类体系的对比研究,为以后该《目录》及相关法律法规的修订提供参考。[方法]运用文献法和比较法,将《危险化学品目录(2015版)》与联合国《全球化学品统一分类和标签制度(第6修订版)》(GHS)和《联合国关于危险货物运输的建议书规章范本(第19修订版)》(TDG)进行对比研究,比较其危险性确定原则的异同。[结果]《危险化学品目录(2015版)》选取了GHS 95个危险类别中的81个类别作为其化学品危险性确定原则,但与TDG关于危险货物的分类原则存在较大差异。[结论]《危险化学品目录(2015版)》化学品危险性确定原则源于GHS,与TDG两者属于不同体系,但也有重叠交叉部分。
[Objective] To compare the revision of “Catalog of Dangerous Chemical Substances (2015 Edition)” with the UN General Chemical Classification System for future revision of the “Catalog” and related laws and regulations. [Method] The document method and comparative method were used to compare the “dangerous chemicals catalog (2015 edition)” with the UN “GHS” (6th revised edition) and the “ Proposed Model Regulations (Rev. 19) (TDG) to compare and contrast the similarities and differences between the principles of risk determination. [Results] The Catalog of Dangerous Chemicals (2015 Edition) selected 81 of the 95 hazard groups of GHS as the principle for determining its chemical hazard, but there was a big difference from the TDG principle of classification of dangerous goods. [Conclusion] The ”Hazardous Chemicals Catalog (2015 Edition)" is based on the principle of determination of chemical hazards from the GHS, and TDG belong to different systems, but there are overlapping parts.