论文部分内容阅读
人民法院在处理无效经济合同纠纷案件中,发现当事人违反国家利益或社会公共利益而取得或者约定取得的财产依法进行追缴的情形日益增多.由于目前我国法律、法规对追缴的规定比较原则和简略,导致审判实践中认识不一,把握失当,有的法院对违法行为应该适用追缴的却没有适用,从而放纵了违法行为;有的法院对不应当适用追缴的却予以适用,制裁面过宽.在经济审判实践中,并非所有的违法行为都可以适用追缴,那么在何种情况法院方可对无效合同当事人非法取得的或约定取得的财产适用追缴呢?本文就此问题,略陈管见.
In handling cases of disputes over invalid economic contracts, the people's court finds that the property recovered or contracted by the parties in violation of the national interest or the public interests of the public is increasingly being recovered in accordance with the law.Due to the comparatively simple and simple rules and regulations of the laws and regulations of our country, Leading to misunderstandings in the trial practice, mishandling, and some courts should apply the lawsuit against the illegal recovery did not apply, thereby indulging the illegal acts; some courts should not apply the recovery is to apply, sanctions are too wide. In the practice of economic trial, not all the illegal acts can be applied to the recovery, so in what circumstances can the court illegally obtain the contractual parties or agreed to obtain the property to apply for recovery? This article on this issue, slightly oversight.