论文部分内容阅读
作为后起的汉学大师,汪中的墨学研究实循乾嘉经学考据自顾炎武、戴震以降由训诂而义理、以子证经的学术路径。在对周秦学术源流的考察中,汪中还原了儒墨均源于周代文化,为诸子之一的历史本相,阐述了儒墨相等、意相反而实相成的关系,并在此基础上挖掘、张扬墨子的济世情怀。汪中的墨学观虽遭致翁方纲、章学诚的猛烈抨击,折射出乾嘉时期墨学备受排斥、无改异端定位的传统命运,但亦昭示了经学考据与晚清墨学复兴间的内在关联,预示着乾嘉之际儒尊子卑传统思想学术格局变动的新趋向。
As a later master of Sinology, Wang Zhong’s study of Mohist School follows the academic path of Qian-Jia-Jing studies from Gu-Yan-Wu and Dai-Zhen to justification and evidence-based theory. In the study of academic origin of Zhou Qin Dynasty, Wang Zhong restored the origin of Confucianism and Mohism in the culture of the Zhou Dynasty, which is one of the philosophers of history. It expounds the relationship between Confucianism and Moism being equal but opposite in fact, Based on this excavation, publicity Mohist feelings. Although Wang Zhong’s Mohism was criticized by Weng Fanggang and Zhang Xuecheng, it reflects the traditional rejection of Mohism during the Qianghua period and the absence of the traditional destiny of heresy. However, it also shows the internal and external relations between the study of Confucian classics and the revival of Mohism in late Qing Dynasty Relevance indicates the new tendency of the change of the academic structure of Confucian respect and sublime traditional ideology during the Qianghong and Jiaxing periods.