一 對李述先生意見的總印象我讀了「人民教育」一九五四年十一月號上李述先生「結合當前實際,學習蘇聯語文教學經驗」一文,覺得看法似有問題。李先生這篇文章是批評葉蒼岑先生編著的「論語文教學改革問題」一書的。於是我又找來原書看了一遍,覺得問題更嚴重了。我覺得李述先生對普希金專家的意見的现實性、深刻性、重要性了解不够,對蘇聯在語文教學方面的先進經驗認識不够,對我國目前「語文教學實際」的了解是片面的,對我們今後「語文教學改革方向」的認識是模糊的。因而就把作戰的矛頭指錯了,對新生力量不予以支持,對「語文教學改革問題」一書的出版,表示了不歡迎的態度。李先生的中心論點在文章中表出的方式有些吞吞吐吐、躲躲閃閃,但細讀全文,一貫的精神還是可以明白的。我且擇錄一些要點,然後加以說明: 一、葉蒼岑先生沒有「全面介紹普希金專家的意見」,而且是「忽略了專家發言中的更重要的一些問題」。二、「沒有全面地從我們目前的實際出發」,而是「根據他自己理會的這些語文教學的特徵,去介紹普希金專家的意見,去指導師大同學的試教,去發揮關於語文教學改革的議論」。三、「這就必然會使各地學校在學習專家的指導意見時,發生了一些只重形式、專講方法的偏向」。四、「方法是要談的,語文教學的方法是必須改進的。問題在於不要片面的談方法,不要脫離實際……我認為我們改革語文教學,在教師鑽研了教材、掌握了教學目的和必要的參考資料之後,應該研究教學方法的改進」。「在步屨 The Overall Impression of a View of Mr. Li Shu I read the article entitled “Education for the People” on November 11, 1944, by Mr. Li Shu, who “combined with the current situation to learn the teaching experience of the Soviet Union in the Soviet Union.” I feel there seems to be a problem. Mr. Li’s article criticizes Mr. Ye Cang-cen’s book On the Teaching Reform of Chinese. So I got the original book read it again, I think the problem is more serious. I think Mr. Li’s lack of understanding of the reality, profoundness and importance of Pushkin’s expert opinions is not enough. He does not have enough understanding of the advanced experience of the Soviet Union in teaching Chinese and his understanding of the current “Chinese teaching practice” is one-sided. Our understanding of the direction of “language teaching reform” in the future is vague. Therefore, he pointed his finger at the wrong finger and disapproved of the Forces nouvelles. He also expressed his unwelcome attitude toward the publication of the book “Problems of Chinese Teaching Reform.” The central argument of Mr Li’s article in the article shows some of the way to vomit, dodge, but read the full text, the spirit of the past can still understand. I would like to record some important points and then explain: Firstly, Mr. Ip did not “give a comprehensive introduction to the opinions of Pushkin experts” and “overlooked some of the more important issues raised by the experts.” Second, “we did not proceed from our current reality in an all-round way.” Instead, we introduced the opinions of Pushkin experts based on the characteristics of the language teaching that he himself had taken care of to guide the teaching and learning of normal university teachers and students and to give full play to the teaching reform of Chinese The discussion. “ Thirdly, ”this will inevitably lead to the emergence of some emphasis and methodological bias in the study of experts’ guidance in various local schools.“ Four, ”The method is to talk about the language teaching methods must be improved. The problem is not one-sided approach, not from reality ... ... I think we reform the teaching of Chinese, teachers in the study of teaching materials, to master the purpose of teaching and necessary After the reference material, should study the teaching method improvement “. ”At the footsteps