论文部分内容阅读
通过实例分析,发现兼语句各成分意义之和与句子整体意义相去甚远,从而否定了兼语句NP1+V1+NP2+V2是V1+NP2和NP2+V2的套合说。并由此提出:一、句式意义也是语义的一个重要因素;二、兼语句的核心是V1,而不是兼语,进入兼语句的V1具有[+使成]义素。三、兼语句的构成条件有两个,一是句法上符合NP1+V1+NP2+V2的形式,二是V1具有[+使成]义素。这为兼语句的划界问题提供了参考。
Through the case study, it is found that the sum of the meanings of each part of the sentence is far from the overall meaning of the sentence, thus negating the fact that the concurrent sentence NP1 + V1 + NP2 + V2 is a combination of V1 + NP2 and NP2 + V2. And thus put forward: First, the sentence meaning is also an important factor of semantics; Second, the core of concurrent sentences is V1, rather than both, into the sentence and the V1 has a [+ make into] semantic elements. Third, the composition of sentences and conditions There are two conditions, one is syntactically consistent with the form of NP1 + V1 + NP2 + V2, the second is that V1 has a [+ make into] semen. This provides a reference for the delimitation of concurrent sentences.