论文部分内容阅读
第二次世界大战之后,传播技术大大推进了全球资本主义市场的扩张。从五十年代到七十年代中期,由H.A.英尼斯、W.施拉姆、E.罗杰斯等人开启了传播与国家发展的相关性的研究。直至九十年代,关于此项课题的研究大约有四个不同的路径。其一是受到依附理论和世界体系理论的影响,持强烈批判的立场,揭示出传播技术强化并加速了资本主义全球体系的建构,加深了发展中国家对于发达国家的经济文化依附(E.罗杰斯、H.I.希勒、M.特劳等);其二是从后工业主义历史观出发,指出传播技术与市场结合造就了后工业时代的生产生活方式(D.贝尔);其三是从国际政治及伦理学角度,分析信息资源分享的不平衡,指出南北国家间日益加剧的差距,提出建立新的世界信息与传播秩序的主张(联合国教科文组织MacBride报告);其四是从后现代主义理论立场,揭示在媒介饱和和信息超载情形之下文化变迁和文化认同所面临的困惑和压力(D.
After World War II, communication technology greatly advanced the expansion of the global capitalist market. From the 1950s to the mid-1970s, studies by H.A. Innis, W. Schramm, E. Rogers and others on the relevance of dissemination to national development. Until the 1990s, there were about four different paths to the study of this topic. One is that it is strongly criticized by the theory of dependency and the theory of the world system, revealing that communication technologies have strengthened and accelerated the construction of a capitalist global system and deepened the economic and cultural attachment of developing countries to developed countries (E. Rogers , HI Shiller, M. Traudi, etc.); secondly, starting from the post-industrialist view of history, pointing out that the combination of communication technology and the market has created the post-industrial production and lifestyle (D. Bell); thirdly, And ethics, analyze the unbalanced sharing of information resources, point out the growing gap between North and South countries and put forward the proposal of establishing a new world information and communication order (UNESCO MacBride report); fourthly, from the perspective of postmodernism Position to reveal the confusion and pressures facing cultural change and cultural identity under media saturation and overloaded information (D.