汉代文物的研究,先有宋代开始繁荣的金石学的基础,近世以来,陈直先生等以史籍和器物互证,开一学术新径。就比较全面的综合考察而言,我们看到日本学者林巳奈夫的《漠代の史物》(京都大学人文科学研究所1976年版)一书,予出土品和传世品以同样的重视,对器物和画像兼收博采,将文物和文献比照研究。作者的意图,如该书序言所说,在于“追求对当时文化的尽可能全面的认识”,其方法,是“广泛地灵活地运用汉代文献、遗物和图像资料”。作者期望这部著作“为专门研究者对汉代文物的认识提供帮助,进而对所有关心中国历史文化的人们提供参考”。这一目的,应当说是实现了。孙机先生又有《汉代物质文化资 Han Dynasty cultural relics research, first began to flourish in the Song Dynasty gold stone foundation, since modern times, Chen Zhirong and other historical records and artifacts mutual evidence, open a new academic path. For a more comprehensive and comprehensive survey, we can see that the monumental product and the world-famous product were given the same attention by the Japanese scholar LAM Nanaif’s book “The History of the Deserted Manifesto” (Institute of Humanities, Kyoto University, 1976) Both artifacts and portraits, cf. cultural relics and literature research. The author’s intention, as the book preface says, lies in “pursuing as comprehensively as possible an understanding of the culture at that time.” The method is to “make extensive and flexible use of the Han documents, relics and image materials.” The author expects this book “to help specialists understand the relics in the Han Dynasty and to provide a reference for all those who care about Chinese history and culture.” This purpose should be said to be achieved. Sun Ji has another "material and cultural resources in the Han Dynasty