本文是对上期《<伐檀>是一首敬老歌》的讨论文章,从文化背景、孔子删诗、“君子”称谓、“不素餐”的释义四个方面否认了该文的四条主要铱据,着重论述了“君子”之称在《伐檀》中并非特指“老人”。认为该文缺乏可信的论据,其“敬老”说的观点难以成立。 This essay is a discussion article about the previous issue of “Hualin Tan is a respecting old song”. From the four aspects of cultural background, the deletion of poems by Confucius, the title of “Gentleman” and the definition of “no meal” , Focusing on the “gentleman,” said in the “Sandalwood” is not specifically refers to “the elderly.” In the opinion of this article, there is a lack of credible arguments and the viewpoint of “respecting the elderly” is difficult to set up.