论文部分内容阅读
“新史学”和“传统史学”是相对而言的。在当代中国音乐史学界,新史学以多视野、多视角、综合性的思维对传统音乐史学的研究产生巨大冲击以及影响,出现的种种问题是值得我们去思考的。像当下最需要我们厘清的便是“历史民族音乐学”这种提法妥当与否,如果不妥,那么从新史学思维角度怎样去理解“音乐史学”与“民族音乐学”研究交叉的出现。现在本文以新史学思维对传统音乐史学研究的影响为视角,探寻当下“音乐史学”与“民族音乐学”研究交叉的史学研究方法问题,希望能对此问题的解决有所帮助。
“New History” and “Traditional History” are relative terms. In contemporary Chinese music historians, the new historiography has a huge impact and impact on the study of traditional music historiography with multi-horizons, multi-perspectives and comprehensive thinking. All of these problems deserve our consideration. Like most of the moment we need to clarify is “historical ethnomusicology, ” This formulation is appropriate or not, if not properly, then from the perspective of new historical thinking how to understand “Music History” and “Ethnomusicology ”Study the emergence of crossover. Now, with the view of the influence of new historiography on the study of traditional music history, this paper explores the historical research methods of the current study of “Musical History” and “Ethnomusicology”, hoping to help solve this problem. .