清代学者在一定意义上继承了宋明理学家关于儒家道统存在断裂的论断,而对其接续工作的不满,则是他们从事考据学的理论动机。经过层层追问,他们发现,存在相通之理的文字、音韵、训诂乃是断裂时期中较为连续的存在,并因此主张通过订正三者来彰显经典的本义。清代学者在这一思考模式下所从事的工作具有相当的价值,但是也存在着一定的弊病。 In a certain sense, scholars of Qing Dynasty inherited the thesis that the reason why Song and Ming Neo-Confucianism ruptured the existence of Confucianism and Taoism, and their dissatisfaction with the continuation of their work, are the theoretical motives of their study. After several layers of questioning, they found that the existence of connected texts, phonology, exegesis is a more continuous existence in the period of rupture, and therefore advocates the revision of the three to demonstrate the original meaning of the classic. The works of Qing scholars in this mode of thinking have considerable value, but there are also some drawbacks.