论文部分内容阅读
【目的】了解国内外图书馆学情报学期刊网站可用性是否存在差异及差异的来源。【方法】以国内18种、国外21种高影响力的图书馆学情报学期刊网站为分析对象,采用可达性、可读性、网站响应速度和网站链接效果进行比较测评。【结果】国内外图书馆学情报学期刊在网站可用性方面存在一定程度的差异,国内图书馆学情报学期刊网站在可用性方面有一定的改进空间。【结论】国内期刊应当更多地从使用者的角度考虑网站建设,科技期刊网站的可用性应根据不同的语言进行有针对性的评价。
【Objective】 To understand whether there are differences and differences in the usability of library and information science journals at home and abroad. 【Method】 With 18 kinds of domestic and foreign 21 kinds of influential periodical websites of library science and information science as the analysis object, comparative evaluation was conducted by using reachability, readability, website response speed and website link effect. 【Results】 There are some differences in website usability of library and information science journals at home and abroad, and there is room for improvement in the usability of domestic library and information science journals. 【Conclusion】 Domestic journals should consider site construction more from the perspective of users. The availability of sci-tech periodical websites should be evaluated according to different languages.