彭剑先生认为,清季预备立宪九年清单并未宣布开国会年限,恐怕有些误解。彭先生如此说法的根据有三点,一是清单条文中没有在哪一年召开国会的规定;二是宪政编查馆虽然认为筹备年限应以九年为期,但在奏折中没有说应该在哪一年召开国会。其实,这两点均不能作为否定宣布召开国会年? Mr. Peng Jian believes that there is some misunderstanding about the fact that the nine-year inventory of the preparatory constitutional period in the Qing dynasty did not announce the number of years for opening a meeting. According to Mr. Peng’s argument, there are three basic points: First, the provisions of the bill are not held in any year in the bill. Second, although the constitutional editorial board thinks that the preparatory period should be nine years, it should not be said which one should be in the memorial Year in Parliament. In fact, neither of these two points can be announced as a negative parliamentary year?