论文部分内容阅读
戴维.埃伦费尔德的《人道主义的僭妄》,是西方生态主义由经验研究发展到从哲学世界观高度对人与自然界关系的全面反思的代表作之一。马克思主义生态学思想同以埃伦费尔德为代表的西方生态哲学之间的根本分歧,主要体现在如何看待生态保护的哲学基础、生态危机的根本原因和实现生态平衡的实践对策三个方面。只有坚持“实践唯物主义”的自然观和历史观,坚持科技进步、经济发展与生态保护的统一,促进社会关系的变革和人的生存方式的提升,才是解决生态问题的真正途径。
David Ellenfeld’s “humanitarian delirium” is one of the masterpieces by which western ecologism developed from empirical research to a comprehensive reflection on the relationship between man and nature from a philosophical worldview. The fundamental differences between Marxist ecological thinking and Western ecological philosophy represented by Ehrenfeld mainly embody in three aspects: how to treat the philosophical foundation of ecological protection, the root causes of ecological crisis and the practical countermeasures to achieve ecological balance . Only by adhering to the view of nature and history of “practical materialism”, adhering to the unification of scientific and technological progress, economic development and ecological protection, promoting the transformation of social relations and enhancing people’s living style are the real solutions to ecological problems.