论文部分内容阅读
行政诉讼批复答复是我国固有的诉讼制度,是作为观察我国法院疑难案件裁判方法的实证材料,它拓展了法律文本的系统性、整体性的解释方向,并且,在行政审判中发挥了应有的作用。但是,社会各界对其质疑也从未间断,强力要求取消法院内部案件请示。为此,我们有必要对“请示——答复”这种制度安排进行梳理和研判,通过对批复答复进行诉讼化改造,将行政化模式转向诉讼模式,以期在功能上加以改善。把个案裁判中的有益成果引入到案例当中,最终经过严格的筛选程序,形成具有判例功能的案例指导制度。
The reply of administrative litigation is the inherent litigation system in our country. It is an empirical material for observing the method of refereeing difficult cases in the courts of our country. It expands the systematic and holistic explanation of legal texts, and plays a due role in administrative trial effect. However, all sectors of society have never stopped questioning them and strongly requested the removal of the court case. Therefore, it is necessary for us to sort out and judge the institutional arrangements such as “petition-reply” and to transform the administrative mode into a litigation mode by litigating the reply replies, with a view to improving its function. The case referees in the beneficial results into the case of them, and ultimately undergo a rigorous screening process, the formation of a precedent function case guidance system.