论文部分内容阅读
书评一直是我国理论界比较欠缺的一个方面,对一本著作的学术价值和优劣得失进行严肃认真的评论,实在做得太少,这可能与某些人的心态有关:作者不愿意得罪人,编者也不愿意成为矛盾的焦点。至于那种带有个人感情色彩的评论,虽属少见,但它对理论的健康发展却更为有害。 我们认为,认真严肃的书评是理论健康发展的动力。本刊加强书评(Book Reuew)栏目,正是基于上述认识的一种尝试,目的在于促进中国自然辩证法事业的健康发展。戈革先生与Pais是多年的老朋友,但作者对Pais新著《玻尔传》的评论不但相当具体,也颇为中肯。我们欢迎这样的书评。
Book reviews have always been one of the most scarce aspects of our theoretical circle. It is too serious to comment seriously on the academic value and merits of a book. This may be related to the mentality of some people: the author does not want to offend people , Editors do not want to become the focus of conflicts. As for the kind of commentary with personal feelings, although rare, it is even more harmful to the healthy development of theory. In our opinion, serious and serious book reviews are the motivation for the healthy development of theory. Our publication of the Book Reuew column is an attempt based on the above understanding aimed at promoting the healthy development of China’s natural dialectics. Mr. Gege and Pais are old friends for many years, but the author’s comments on Pais’s new book “Bohr Biography” are not only quite specific but also quite pertinent. We welcome such book reviews.