论文部分内容阅读
民事权利有绝对权与相对权之分,民事法律关系有绝对法律关系和相对法律关系之别,法学界普遍承认绝对权和绝对法律关系存在的客观性,但目前还没有见到任何关于绝对法律行为和相对法律行为的论述。事实上,绝对法律行为在逻辑上是成立的,在制度设计上具有可操作性,在某些特定领域能够产生积极的社会效果。德国物权行为理论清晰地认识了相对权与绝对权、绝对法律关系和相对法律关系之间的差异,但它没有能够把这种区分贯彻到法律行为领域,德国物权行为理论的症结恰恰就在这里。
Civil rights have the absolute right and the relative right, the civil legal relationship has the absolute legal relationship and the relative legal relationship, the legal profession generally admits the existence of absolute rights and absolute legal relationship objectivity, but has not yet seen any absolute legal acts And the relative legal acts of the discussion. In fact, absolute legal acts are logically formed, operational in system design, and can produce positive social effects in specific areas. The theory of real rights and behavior in Germany clearly recognizes the differences between relative rights and absolute rights, absolute legal relations and relative legal relations, but it fails to carry out this distinction into the field of legal acts. The crux of the German theory of real rights and actions it's here.