论文部分内容阅读
目的评价Metapex根充糊剂与传统根充糊剂用于乳牙一次性根管充填的疗效。方法将广东省佛山市南海区丹灶医院口腔科2007年10月至2009年10月收治的慢性根尖周炎患儿120例(152颗患病乳牙)随机分为A组(Metapex根充糊剂)、B组(氢氧化钙糊剂)、C组(氧化锌碘仿糊剂),分别用3种糊剂行一次法根管充填。随访观察1年,比较治疗效果。结果术后1周A组与B、C组疼痛发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1周A组疗效优于B、C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后6个月和1年,A组的治疗成功率高于B、C组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 Metapex根充糊剂充填乳牙根管疗效优于氧化锌碘仿糊剂和氢氧化钙糊剂。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of Metapex root-filling paste and traditional root-filling paste in primary root canal filling of deciduous teeth. Methods 120 cases of chronic periapical periodontitis (152 diseased deciduous teeth) admitted from October 2007 to October 2009 in Danzao Hospital of Foshan City, Guangdong Province were randomly divided into group A (Metapex Group B (calcium hydroxide paste) and Group C (zinc oxide iodoform paste) were used. Followed up for 1 year, the treatment effect was compared. Results The incidence of pain in group A and B and C at 1 week after operation was significantly different (P <0.05). The effect of group A was better than group B and C after 1 week, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). After 6 months and 1 year, the success rate of treatment in group A was higher than that in group B and C (P <0.05). Conclusion Metapex root filling paste is superior to zinc iodide paste and calcium hydroxide paste in root canal filling.