论文部分内容阅读
三、新派的强势话语至五月初上海《时事新报》上新辟《文学旬刊》附刊,由郑振铎主编,属于文学研究会的发表园地,即刻投入了新旧文学论战。其实文学研究会里也非铁板一块,与周作人、俞平伯、朱自清等人相比,茅盾和郑振铎在文学思想与政治倾向方面要激进得多,两人分别掌握《小说月报》和《文学旬刊》,在反对旧派方面也最为坚决激烈。此时茅盾正极度醉心西化,一边大力抨击传统文学,把“文以载道”、“文人”的“游戏态度”等都归入“旧”的害人的东西,一边主张仿效“自然主义”来实践科学写实的文学创作。所谓“现代文学都不免受过自然主义的洗礼,那么,就文学进化的通则而言,中国新文学的将来也是免不得要经过这
Third, the new school of strong discourse to Shanghai in early May ”Current Affairs News“ on the new ”literary Xunpai“ appendix, edited by Zheng Zhenduo, belongs to the literary research community published the field immediately into the old and the new literature controversy. In fact, the literary research conference is also not a piece of iron. Compared with Zhou Zuoren, Yu Pingbo and Zhu Ziqing, Mao Dun and Zheng Zhenduo are far more radical in literary thinking and political orientation. Both of them have mastered ”Monthly of Novel“ and ”Literature Ten Journal“ , The most resolute and fierce opposition to the old school. At this time, Mao Dun is extremely obsessed with Westernization, while criticizing the traditional literature vigorously, the ”text to load “, ”scholar “ ”game attitude “ and so on are classified as ”old , While advocating imitation of “naturalism” to practice scientific and realistic literary creation. The so-called “modern” literature is not immune to the baptism of naturalism. Therefore, as far as the general rule of literature evolution is concerned, the future of Chinese new literature is inevitable.