法律实践中,同一被执行人在不同地区、不同审级法院经常出现同为被告或被执行人的情形,也就经常出现享有优先受偿权的债权人申请执行的法院与首先采取控制措施获得优先处分权的法院不一样的情形,本案即属此类。在处理本案过程中,执行法院虽无法定优先处分被查封股权的权力,但是经过与查封在先法院及其他债权人协调后,取得了他们的配合与支持,使得本案获得圆满解决。 In legal practice, the same enforced person often appears as a defendant or executor in different regions and tribunals, and often the courts that have the priority right to apply for compensation are given priority in taking enforcement measures first Disciplinary power of the court is not the case, the case belongs to this category. In the course of handling this case, the enforcement court, though it has no statutory priority, punishes the right to be seized, but has obtained their cooperation and support after being sealed up with the previous court and other creditors, so that the case can be satisfactorily resolved.