论文部分内容阅读
目的对比分析低位直肠癌保肛手术与Miles手术治疗直肠癌的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2010年9月至2015年11月136例直肠癌患者的临床资料。结果两组手术时间相比差异未见统计学意义(P>0.05),但治疗组术中出血量、术后排气时间、日排便次数以及住院时间均明显少于对照组,术后并发症发生率低于对照组,术后生活质量优良率高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论低位直肠癌保肛手术治疗直肠癌的临床效果显著,具有推广价值。
Objective To compare and analyze the clinical effects of sphincter preserving surgery and Miles surgery for rectal cancer in low rectal cancer. Methods The clinical data of 136 patients with rectal cancer from September 2010 to November 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Results There was no significant difference in operative time between the two groups (P> 0.05). However, the blood loss, postoperative exhaust time, defecation frequency and hospital stay in the treatment group were significantly less than those in the control group and postoperative complications The incidence of postoperative quality of life was lower than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Low rectal cancer anal sphincter preservative surgery for the treatment of rectal cancer has a significant clinical effect, with the promotion of value.