论文部分内容阅读
目的建立县级疾控机构卫生应急人员胜任力评价指标体系,为其培训和考核提供理论依据。方法通过文献研究法、Delphi法筛选胜任力指标并建立评价指标框架;利用层次分析法计算各级指标重要性的权重值,形成评价指标体系。结果共选取卫生应急领域23名专家进行咨询,2轮专家咨询表的问卷回收率均为100%,专家咨询表的Cronbach’sα系数分别为0.965和0.976;第一轮专家咨询确定该指标体系共包含4个一级指标,10个二级指标和40个三级指标,其中逻辑判断、语言表达、高标准、主动积极、预防为主、风险意识等在胜任力模型中的权重较高;通过2轮专家咨询最终确定县级疾控机构卫生应急人员胜任力评价指标体系,包含5个一级指标,12个二级指标和43个三级指标。结论逻辑判断和语言表达的基本能力,积极主动和高标准的个性特征,预防为主和风险意识的应急理念是其胜任力的重要特征;采用Delphi法和层次分析法科学确定了该指标体系各指标的权重,研究结果具有可靠性。
Objective To establish the competency evaluation index system of health emergency personnel in county-level CDC institutions and provide a theoretical basis for their training and assessment. Methods Through literature research method, Delphi method screened the competency index and established the evaluation index frame; the analytic hierarchy process was used to calculate the weight value of the importance of each level index to form the evaluation index system. Results A total of 23 experts in the field of health emergency were selected for consultation. The questionnaire recovery rate was 100% in two rounds of expert consultation questionnaire, and 0.965 and 0.976 respectively in expert consultation questionnaire. The first round of expert consultation determined that the index system Including 4 first-level indicators, 10 second-level indicators and 40 third-level indicators. Among them, logical judgment, language expression, high standards, proactive, prevention-oriented and risk-aware are more weighted in the competency model. 2 rounds of expert consultation and finally determine the evaluation system of competency of health emergency personnel at county-level CDC institutions, including 5 first-level indicators, 12 second-level indicators and 43 third-level indicators. Conclusion The basic ability of logical judgment and language expression, active and high standards of personality traits, prevention-oriented and risk awareness of the emergency concept is an important feature of their competencies; using Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process to determine the index system The weight of indicators, the research results are reliable.