论文部分内容阅读
郎咸平与红十字会关于无偿与有偿使用的活题热议,凸显了公民知情权的缺失。2011年8月初,郎咸平在微博上与红十字会关于“无偿献血、有偿使用”展开论战,他表达两个意思:首先,红十字会每年靠垄断卖血赚得盆满钵满;其次,老百姓无偿献血,用血的时候却要花钱买。众多网友积极响应郎咸平,这也使得一
Lang and the Red Cross hot topic on the issue of free and paid use highlights the lack of citizen’s right to know. At the beginning of August 2011, Lang started an argumentative debate with the Red Cross on Weibo with “blood donation paid and used for compensation.” He expressed two meanings: Firstly, the Red Cross earns a monopoly by selling monopoly blood every year; Second, people donate blood at no cost, but spend money on it. Many users respond positively to Lang, which also makes one