目前各方面在经济是否“软着陆”上存在三种不同的认识。其一是“已经软着陆论”,其主要论据是宏观调控措施出台以后,固定资产投资已经明显降温,眼下企业产成品积压严重,相互拖欠突出,产销率低,相当一部分企业开工不足,市场已出现了最终需求不足的征兆。其二是“尚未软着陆论”,其主要论据是眼下经济增长率仍然偏高,固定资产投资增长还比较快,通货膨胀率仍居高不下,资源约束的矛盾仍突出。其三是“正在趋向预期目标论”,其主要论据是“软着陆”只是一种抽象的说法,实际生活中很难操作,还不如说调控预期目标是否实现更科学,由此出发,认为加强宏观 At present, there are three different understandings on whether the economy is “soft landing.” One is “already soft landing theory”, the main argument is the introduction of macro-control measures, investment in fixed assets has dropped significantly, now the backlog of serious business products, arrears outstanding each other, the production and marketing rate is low, a considerable number of enterprises underdeveloped, the market has been There was a sign of a lack of final demand. The other is “not yet soft landing theory”. The main argument is that the current economic growth rate is still high, the growth of fixed assets investment is still relatively fast, the inflation rate is still high, and the contradiction of resource constraints is still outstanding. The third one is “Toward the Expected Objectives,” whose main argument is that “soft landing” is merely an abstract statement that is difficult to manipulate in real life. It is not as good as regulating whether the expected goal is more scientific. Macro