儒家诠释学的当代发展

来源 :中国思潮评论 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:myfarm
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
儒家思想向来以诠释经典为主要的表达方式,对经书的注解是历代儒者的学问主业。到了20世纪,这一情况发生了根本性的改变,注疏古经不再是新儒家人物十分关注的事情,甚至新儒学思想的推进也多半不依赖于经典源泉所提供的动力,而是别有他途。儒家思想之诠释内容及形式的变化,显然是和中国现代学术的发育与成长紧密地联系在一起的,分科而治的学问格局和古典学术日渐材料化的身份,使得传统儒学以经典诠释为中心的系统架构已难以为继,只 Confucianism has always been to interpret the classic as the main expression, the annotation of the scriptures is the main Confucian scholars in the academic history. In the 20th century, this situation has undergone fundamental changes. The annotation of the ancient times is no longer a matter of great concern to Neo-Confucian figures. Even the promotion of Neo- Confucianism is mostly independent of the motivation provided by the classical sources, He way. The content and form of Confucianism’s interpretation of change is obviously closely linked with the development and growth of modern Chinese academy. The academic structure of dividing one’s rule from another and the increasingly materialized status of classical academic make the traditional Confucianism centered on the classical interpretation The system architecture has been unsustainable, only
其他文献
“人性”在战国时期是一大热点话题,孟子主张性善论,而荀子则提出截然相反的性恶论。荀子认为人生而有欲望,饥而欲饱,寒而欲暖,劳而欲休。顺应欲望的发展,就会出现争夺,结果