论文部分内容阅读
图书编校质量是图书质量的一个重要指标,良好出版社在加强图书编校质量管理,建立健全图书编校质量管理机制方面应为全国出版社树立榜样。但是,2001年新闻出版总署对全国139家良好出版社进行的图书编校质量检查的结果却非常不能令人满意,特别是在抽查过程中竟然有33.3%的图书不合格,这说明目前我国图书编校质量存在滑坡现象。为此,我们采访了新闻出版总署副署长柳斌杰,并特约业内的专家、学者吴道弘、邵益文同志针对这次检查的情况发表了看法,同时请两位参与此次图书质量检查的审读员就检查中发现的突出问题进行了分析,此外还将部分图书中出现的典型差错做了列表说明。我们希望能通过这组文章给全国的出版社再次敲响警钟,引起广大出版工作者对图书编校工作的高度重视,从而进一步推动我国出版事业的健康发展。同时也希望各方面的同仁对图书编校质量问题发表自己的看法,我们将陆续予以刊发。
Book editing and editing quality is an important indicator of the quality of books. A good publishing house should set an example for the national press in strengthening the quality control of book editing and editing and establishing and improving the quality management mechanism of book editing and editing. However, in 2001, the General Administration of Press and Publication Administration conducted a quality inspection on the compilation of books by 139 well-known publishing houses across the country. The result was very unsatisfactory. In particular, 33.3% of the books failed during the random inspection. This shows that at present, Editing quality landslides phenomenon. To this end, we interviewed Liu Binjie, deputy director general of the Press and Publication Administration, and specialists and scholars in the industry, Wu Daohong and Shao Yiwen, expressed their opinions on the inspection and invited two readers who participated in the quality inspection of the book The prominent problems found in the inspection were analyzed, and some typical errors that appeared in some books were also listed. We hope that through this series of articles, the national press will be sounded the alarm once again, arousing the great attention of the majority of publishing workers to the compilation and editing of books, so as to further promote the healthy development of our publishing industry. At the same time, I also hope that my colleagues in all fields will express my views on the quality of book editing and editing and we will publish them one after another.