论文部分内容阅读
本文采用定量与定性相结合的方法,对近3年发表于核心期刊的389篇社会政策研究文章所使用的研究方法进行了内容分析。研究发现,在我国社会政策研究中,规范性研究较多,实证性研究较少,实证研究中主要使用的是调查研究、实地研究、文献研究与制度分析等研究方法。尽管在这些研究中确实涌现出了一批较为规范的实证研究,但是,我国的社会政策研究还远未能形成与国际接轨的研究方法体系。这种情况妨碍了我国社会政策学科的专业化和“本土化”。下一步,我们应该加强社会政策研究方法体系的建设,促进社会政策学科的成熟,为社会政策的理论与实践提供研究工具上的支持。
In this paper, quantitative and qualitative methods are used to analyze the research methods used in 389 social policy research articles published in the core journals in the past three years. The study finds that in our social policy research, there are more normative studies and less empirical research. Empirical research mainly uses research methods such as investigation, field research, literature research and institutional analysis. Although a number of more normative empirical studies have indeed emerged in these studies, the study of social policies in our country is far from being able to form a system of research methods in line with the international standards. This situation hindered the specialization and “localization ” of our social policy disciplines. In the next step, we should strengthen the construction of social policy research methodology, promote the maturity of social policy disciplines and provide support for the research tools for the theory and practice of social policies.