论文部分内容阅读
中国近代史研究多年遇到“交叉错位”的难题。非正义的侵略方代表着先进的资本主义；正义的被侵略方代表着落后的封建主义。从鸦片战争到辛亥革命，先进的中国人不自觉地想解决这对矛盾，并产生了不同时期的奋斗模式。对这种奇特历史现象的研究，说到底是对殖民主义的评价。其一，殖民主义对落后民族的侵略和掠夺造成了巨大的灾难；其二，殖民侵略事实上充当了历史不自觉的工具；其三，殖民地半殖民地必须在民族独立和主权自有的条件下才能支配生产力发展的新成果。因此，注意“交叉错位”的两点论，更注重重点论，是能够科学地解决这一难题的。
The study of modern Chinese history for many years encountered “cross-misplaced” problem. The unjust aggressor represents advanced capitalism; the just aggressor party represents backward feudalism. From the Opium War to the Revolution of 1911, the advanced Chinese unconsciously tried to resolve the contradictions and came up with a struggle model of different periods. The study of this peculiar historical phenomenon, after all, is an assessment of colonialism. First, colonialism posed tremendous catastrophe for aggression and plunder of backward nations. Second, colonial aggression virtually acted as an unconscious tool of history. Thirdly, the colonial and semi-colonial countries must, under the conditions of national independence and sovereignty, Can we control the new achievements in the development of the productive forces. Therefore, paying attention to the “cross-dislocation” two-point theory, pay more attention to the key theory is to be able to solve this problem scientifically.