论文部分内容阅读
侵权行为法作为一门重要的部门法,具备四方面的社会功能:创设与保护民事权益功能、补偿功能、分散损失与平衡社会利益、教育与惩戒功能。这一法律机制所拥有的巨大社会功能使其适用的理性化限定成为法治的关键环节,这就引出了侵权行为法的归责原则问题。我国民法学界关于侵权责任的归责原则,存在一元论、二元论和三元论三种理论学说。本文试通过对现存几个归责原则的分析讨论和对比综合提出个人的观点。
As an important department law, tort law has four aspects of social function: creation and protection of civil rights function, compensation function, decentralization of loss and balance of social interests, education and punishment function. The immense social function possessed by this legal mechanism has made its application of rationalization a key link in the rule of law, thus leading to the question of the principle of attribution of tort law. There are three theoretical theories of monism, dualism and ternaryism in the principle of imputation of tort liability in civil law scholars of our country. This paper tries to put forward personal opinions through the analysis, discussion and comparison of several existing imputation principles.