自胡三省注《通鉴》之后,数百年来史学界即有一种传统看法,认为司马光在《通鉴》附论中借古讽今,影射攻击王安石变法,本文对这种观点提出质疑。通过考察司马光著《通鉴》有关卷帙和王安石任官行事之时间,兼及司马光本人前后思想的连续性和对前人思想的继承,作者对胡三省所列举并为后世学者公认的“影射”诸例予以甄别辨析,区分出三类情况:一是不实之辞;二是既有联系又有区别;三是确有影射。 After hundreds of years of annotating “Hujian” from the Hu three provinces, there is a traditional view in the historiography circles that Sima Guang was challenged by Wang Anshi’s verse in the appendix of “Tongjian” to challenge this viewpoint . By examining Sima Guang’s “Tong Jian” about the time when Juan Chang and Wang Anshi were acting, and the continuity of thought before and after Sima Guang himself and his succession to the thought of his predecessors, "Examples of discrimination to be discriminated, distinguish three types of situations: First, false words; Second, there are both existing and different; Third, there is indeed a shadow.