论文部分内容阅读
张涨在2015年8月28日《广州日报》撰文指出:全面推开中小学教师职称制度改革,对那些为职称疲于奔命的一线教师而言,是一大福音。改革原则正中现行职称体系中的多处“病灶”:统一中小学教师职称、改变过分强调论文学历倾向、建立同行专家评审机制等一系列矛盾,从职称设置、评价标准、评价机制等多个方面入手,让人对此次改革的力度、深度和广度期待满满。一方面,改革以公正合理为价值取向。比如,此次改革提出的职称统一,就是看准了现行分开设立中小学教师职称的种种弊端做出的合理化修正。目前,中学和小学教师职称无法打通,
Zhang rose in the August 28, 2015 “Guangzhou Daily” wrote that: a comprehensive push down the reform of the system of primary and secondary school teachers, for those professions tired of the front-line teachers, is a big blessing. In the middle of the reform principle, there are many “lesion” in the current system of professional title: a series of contradictions such as the reorganization of the title of primary and secondary school teachers, the over-emphasis on the dissertation academic qualifications, the establishment of the peer review mechanism, the setting of professional titles, the evaluation criteria and the evaluation mechanism Aspects to start, people on the strength of this reform, depth and breadth expect full. On the one hand, the reform is based on fair and reasonable values. For example, the unification of professional titles proposed by this reform is a rectification of the rationalization made by the existing defects of the current establishment of the title of primary and secondary school teachers. At present, secondary and primary school teacher titles can not get through,