论文部分内容阅读
马克思的“古典经济学”概念具有明确内涵、外延并与一定的“知识型”相关,这与西方学者在一般的、含糊的意义使用这个概念具有根本的异质性。它界划了一种分析的范式,说明了马克思与资产阶级经济学之间存在着“知识型”的断裂,这种分析范式就是从配第和布阿吉尔贝尔开始的探讨社会结构及由这种结构所决定的运动规律,这是“古典经济学”概念之独特内涵所在。福柯等人忽视了古典经济学的“结构”视角而从“劳动”范畴出发,认为马克思对李嘉图的修正在西方知识的最深层中并未产生真正的间断性,这是没有读懂马克思“古典政治经济学”的真正内涵。
Marx’s concept of “classical economics” has definite connotation, extension and is related to certain “knowledge-type”, which is fundamentally heterogeneous with western scholars’ use of this concept in a general and vague sense. It delimits a paradigm of analysis, which illustrates the existence of a “knowledge-based” break between Marx and bourgeois economics. This paradigm is an analysis of the social structure starting with the first and the second with Archiebel This structure determines the law of motion, which is the unique connotation of the concept of “classical economics.” Foucault et al. Neglected the “structural” perspective of classical economics and proceeded from the category of “labor”, arguing that Marx’s amendment to Ricardo did not produce any real discontinuity in the deepest layers of Western knowledge. Understand the true connotation of Marx “classical political economy ”.