“严打”因其产生的负面效应在我国已被替代,但是伴随着当下暴恐犯罪日趋普遍化与常态化趋势,其逐渐被再次提起。而法治现代化氛围中的“严打”与早期“严打”有所区别,实质是对以往“严打”的理性评介。同时,结合暴恐犯罪现象的发展变化,我国运用“严打”的方式,通过刑法规制的修正以解决暴恐犯罪的现实问题,进而展现“严打”在立法上的犯罪规制与刑罚惩罚的双重内容。因此,法律化的“严打”对于应对暴恐犯罪抑或是其他犯罪都有其积极性的发展并将作为长期刑事政策予以采用。 “Strike ” has been replaced in our country because of the negative effect it produces. However, along with the trend of universalization and normalization of the crime of terrorism, it is gradually being raised again. The “strike hard” in the atmosphere of rule of law modernization is different from the earlier one. In essence, it is a rational review of past “strike hard.” At the same time, combined with the development and change of the crime of violent crimes, our country uses the way of “strike hard” to solve the practical problems of the crime of violent crimes through the amendment of the criminal law regulations, and then to show the criminal regulation and penalty of “serious strike” in the legislation The double content of punishment. Therefore, the legalized “crackdown” has its own positive development in response to crimes of terrorism or other crimes and will be adopted as a long-term criminal policy.