论文部分内容阅读
本文讨论国际法研究的对象和国际法研究的逻辑学方法,旨在回答何谓国际法研究这一问题。国际法研究是从国际法之内和之外对国际法开展的研究,是通过不同视角和方法产生新思想的过程,以及创造新的视角和方法的过程。本文比较了国际法上的实在法学、政策定向法学及自然法学,特别是其基本观点、观察角度和分析工具,总结了其异同和优劣,并重点分析了实在法学产生新思想的路径。
This article discusses the subject of international law and the logic of international law research, aiming to answer the question of what is meant by the study of international law. International law research is a study of international law, both within and beyond international law, a process of generating new ideas through different perspectives and approaches, as well as a process of creating new perspectives and methods. This article compares the real law, policy-oriented jurisprudence and natural law in international law, especially its basic point of view, observation angle and analysis tool, sums up its similarities and differences and advantages and disadvantages, and focuses on the path of real law to produce new ideas.