与传统的犯罪活动相比,利用互联网犯罪具有犯罪主体智商高、犯罪手段隐蔽、传播速度快、危害区域广、危害后果严重等特点。与之相对应的是利用互联网犯罪案件侦破难度大,打击处理的效率不高、力度明显不足。造成打击不力的原因很多,立法上的滞后是一个重要因素,而利用互联网犯罪及其电子证据的特殊性则直接导致了侦查取证的难度提高。利用互联网犯罪的证据几乎涵盖刑事诉讼法规定的所有证据类型,如书证、物证、言词证据、鉴定结论等等,在查处利用互联网犯罪案件中可能都会有所涉及,但鉴于利用互联网犯罪案件的特殊性,电子证据在其中所起的作用是其他证据无法比拟的,也是目前法律尚未予以明确、司法实践中争议较大的一种证据类型。因此,在侦破和办理利用互联网犯罪案件时必 Compared with the traditional criminal activities, the use of Internet crime has the characteristics of high crime intelligence, concealed crime means, fast propagation speed, wide area damage and serious harm consequences. Correspondingly, the use of the Internet to detect criminal cases is very difficult and the handling efficiency is not high enough. There are many reasons for the weak attack. The legislative lag is an important factor. The particularity of using the Internet crime and its electronic evidence directly leads to the difficulty of investigation and evidence collection. The evidence of crimes committed on the Internet covers almost all the types of evidence stipulated in the Criminal Procedure Law, such as documentary evidence, material evidence, verbal evidence, appraisal conclusion, etc. All may be involved in the investigation and prosecution of crimes committed on the Internet. However, given the special use of Internet crime cases The role of electronic evidence in them is incomparable with other evidences, and it is also a type of evidence that has not yet been clearly defined in the law and has been disputed in judicial practice. Therefore, in the detection and handling of Internet crime cases must be