论文部分内容阅读
笔者认为,从“主体性”的意义来说,认同是人通过对客体的想象,建立主体性的过程。18世纪后期,想象的客体和方式都发生了变化:民族替代上帝,成为人们想象的新客体;口语方言代替神圣语言,成为人们想象的新方式。补充了语言指称功能的文学,以巨大的力量协助了全世界对民族的想象和民族国家的建立,中国的新文学就是一个很好的例子。最后,笔者提出,“文学认同”是“人以文学来想象客体,建立主体性的过程”。它是“人的可塑性”的体现,也是对“人为什么需要文学”的一个回答。
In the author’s opinion, from the perspective of “subjectivity ”, identity is the process by which people establish subjectivity through the imagination of objects. In the later part of the 18th century, the objects and modes of imagination changed: the nation replaced God and became the new object of people’s imagination; and the oral dialect replaced the sacred language and became the new way of people’s imagination. The literature, supplemented by the function of language reference, has given tremendous power to assist the world in imagining the nation and establishing the nation state. The new Chinese literature is a good example. Finally, I propose that “literary identity ” is “people to imagine the object of literature to establish the subjective process ”. It is a manifestation of “human plasticity” and an answer to “why people need literature.”