论文部分内容阅读
对胡锦涛党群关系思想进行梳理和研究,有助于全面掌握科学发展观的内涵,对于弘扬中国共产党密切联系群众的优良传统和作风、巩固党的执政地位具有重大现实意义。胡锦涛党群关系思想的理论特色鲜明:一是与马克思主义党群观的基本原则一脉相承,继承和发展了马克思主义党群思想的精髓,具有思想开放性和历史传承性;二是理论品格与时俱进,体现了马克思主义党群思想发展的时代要求,围绕“以人为本”思想,突出了密切党群关系的行为准则、“群众利益无小事”的价值理念,揭示了密切党群关系的思维路径,从时代高度赋予马克思主义党群观新内涵、新意义。胡锦涛党群关系思想的实践意义明确:一是立足于科学化、民主化和法治化原则,公正化和差异化原则,生活化和实用化原则,创新了群众工作方式,如相互渗透、教育引领、百姓自治等方式;二是探索让群众来评价群众工作的新方式,发挥群众对群众工作评价的主体作用,加快建立领导干部做好群众工作的保障机制,强化群众工作的基层务实导向。
To sort out and study Hu Jintao’s thinking on the relationship between the party and the masses helps to fully grasp the connotation of the scientific concept of development and is of great realistic significance for carrying forward the fine traditions and style of working closely with the masses of the Chinese Communist Party and consolidating the party’s ruling status. The distinctive features of Hu Jintao’s theory of the relationship between the party and the masses have the following characteristics: First, it goes hand in hand with the basic principles of the Marxist party-mass concept, inherits and develops the essence of the Marxist party-mass ideology, and has the openness of thought and the historical inheritance. Second, Advancing and embodying the requirements of the times in the development of the ideology of the development of the ideology of the party and the masses in the party of Marxism, the “people-oriented” thinking has focused on the code of conduct on the relationship between the party and the masses and on the value concept of “no small thing for the benefit of the masses” The Way of Thinking, the New Connotation and the New Significance Given to the Marxist View of the Party from a High Era. The practical significance of Hu’s thinking on the relationship between the party and the masses is clear: First, based on the principles of scientization, democratization and rule of law, the principle of fairness and differentiation, the principle of life and practicality, the working methods of the masses are innovated, such as mutual penetration and education leading And people’s autonomy. The second is to explore new ways for the masses to evaluate the work of the masses, give play to the masses’ role as the main body in evaluating the work of the masses, speed up the establishment of a leading cadre’s mechanism for guaranteeing mass work, and strengthening the pragmatic orientation of the masses at the grass-roots level.