论文部分内容阅读
我国民法典是否应设立债法总则?侵权行为法是否应从债法体系中分立出去?这是当前民法典编纂所讨论的重大问题之一。本文从法典编纂的作业要求、法典编纂的理论背景、各国或地区的民法典关于债法内容安排的通例以及债的一般规范对侵权行为的可适用性等方面,阐述了民法典应设立债法总则以统帅各种具体债,维护债法体系完整性的观点。本文还对主张侵权法独立的理由做了比较深入的剖析,认为这些理由不足以构成侵权法从债法中分立的理由。
Should China’s civil code establish a general rule of debt? Should the law of infringement be separated from the law of debt? This is one of the major issues discussed in the current compilation of civil code. This article elaborates that civil code should establish the law of debt from the operational requirements of the codification, the theoretical background of the codification of the code, the general rules on the content arrangement of the debt law in the civil codes of various countries and regions and the applicability of the general norm of the debt to the infringement. The general rule is to command all kinds of specific bonds and safeguard the integrity of the system of liabilities and laws. This article also analyzes the reasons for advocating the independence of tort law and concludes that these reasons are not enough to justify the separation of tort from debt law.